Control of voltage-gated K+ channel permeability to NMDG+ by a residue at the outer pore
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crystal structures of potassium (K(+)) channels reveal that the selectivity filter, the narrow portion of the pore, is only approximately 3-A wide and buttressed from behind, so that its ability to expand is highly constrained, and the permeation of molecules larger than Rb(+) (2.96 A in diameter) is prevented. N-methyl-d-glucamine (NMDG(+)), an organic monovalent cation, is thought to be a blocker of Kv channels, as it is much larger (approximately 7.3 A in mean diameter) than K(+) (2.66 A in diameter). However, in the absence of K(+), significant NMDG(+) currents could be recorded from human embryonic kidney cells expressing Kv3.1 or Kv3.2b channels and Kv1.5 R487Y/V, but not wild-type channels. Inward currents were much larger than outward currents due to the presence of intracellular Mg(2+) (1 mM), which blocked the outward NMDG(+) current, resulting in a strong inward rectification. The NMDG(+) current was inhibited by extracellular 4-aminopyridine (5 mM) or tetraethylammonium (10 mM), and largely eliminated in Kv3.2b by an S6 mutation that prevents the channel from opening (P468W) and by a pore helix mutation in Kv1.5 R487Y (W472F) that inactivates the channel at rest. These data indicate that NMDG(+) passes through the open ion-conducting pore and suggest a very flexible nature of the selectivity filter itself. 0.3 or 1 mM K(+) added to the external NMDG(+) solution positively shifted the reversal potential by approximately 16 or 31 mV, respectively, giving a permeability ratio for K(+) over NMDG(+) (P(K)(+)/P(NMDG)(+)) of approximately 240. Reversal potential shifts in mixtures of K(+) and NMDG(+) are in accordance with P(K)(+)/P(NMDG)(+), indicating that the ions compete for permeation and suggesting that NMDG(+) passes through the open state. Comparison of the outer pore regions of Kv3 and Kv1.5 channels identified an Arg residue in Kv1.5 that is replaced by a Tyr in Kv3 channels. Substituting R with Y or V allowed Kv1.5 channels to conduct NMDG(+), suggesting a regulation by this outer pore residue of Kv channel flexibility and, as a result, permeability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".