Transport and Function of Cx26 Mutants Involved in Skin and Deafness Disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the subcellular localization and function of several Cx26 mutants that exhibit both sensorineural deafness and various skin disease phenotypes. To facilitate these aims, all Cx26 mutants were tagged at the carboxyl-terminal with green fluorescent protein (GFP), which has previously been shown not to affect Cx26 transport, assembly or function. In this article we focus on two point mutations (R75W and DeltaE42) that occur in the first extracellular loop region of Cx26, a region hypothesized to be critical for correct hemichannel docking between contacting cells. In gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC)-deficient HeLa cells, both R75W-GFP and DeltaE42-GFP were transported to the cell surface and assembled into gap junction-like structures. Neither R75W-GFP nor DeltaE42-GFP formed gap junctions that were permeable to Lucifer Yellow suggesting they are loss-of-function mutations. We also examined the phenotype of these two mutations in a rat epidermal keratinocyte (REK) cell line that is capable of undergoing differentiation. Using antibodies against several members of the connexin family reportedly expressed by epidermal keratinocytes, we found these cells endogenously expressed Cx43 and Cx26 but not Cx30, Cx32, or Cx37. When expressed in REK cells, similar to in HeLa cells, R75W-GFP and DeltaE42-GFP were assembled at the cell surface into structures that resembled gap junctions. Future experiments will examine the effect of the Cx26 mutants on the function and differentiation of these epidermal keratinocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".