MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106232423 · doi:10.1080/cac.10.4-6.353.358

Transport and Function of Cx26 Mutants Involved in Skin and Deafness Disorders

2003· article· en· W2106232423 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Communication & Adhesion · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of GlasgowCancer Research Institute
KeywordsGreen fluorescent proteinCell biologyConnexinLucifer yellowMutantGap junctionBiologyTransfectionIntracellularPhenotypeExtracellularConnexonCell cultureGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the subcellular localization and function of several Cx26 mutants that exhibit both sensorineural deafness and various skin disease phenotypes. To facilitate these aims, all Cx26 mutants were tagged at the carboxyl-terminal with green fluorescent protein (GFP), which has previously been shown not to affect Cx26 transport, assembly or function. In this article we focus on two point mutations (R75W and DeltaE42) that occur in the first extracellular loop region of Cx26, a region hypothesized to be critical for correct hemichannel docking between contacting cells. In gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC)-deficient HeLa cells, both R75W-GFP and DeltaE42-GFP were transported to the cell surface and assembled into gap junction-like structures. Neither R75W-GFP nor DeltaE42-GFP formed gap junctions that were permeable to Lucifer Yellow suggesting they are loss-of-function mutations. We also examined the phenotype of these two mutations in a rat epidermal keratinocyte (REK) cell line that is capable of undergoing differentiation. Using antibodies against several members of the connexin family reportedly expressed by epidermal keratinocytes, we found these cells endogenously expressed Cx43 and Cx26 but not Cx30, Cx32, or Cx37. When expressed in REK cells, similar to in HeLa cells, R75W-GFP and DeltaE42-GFP were assembled at the cell surface into structures that resembled gap junctions. Future experiments will examine the effect of the Cx26 mutants on the function and differentiation of these epidermal keratinocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it