Modified Local Discriminant Bases Algorithm and Its Application in Analysis of Human Knee Joint Vibration Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knee joint disorders are common in the elderly population, athletes, and outdoor sports enthusiasts. These disorders are often painful and incapacitating. Vibration signals [vibroarthrographic (VAG)] are emitted at the knee joint during the swinging movement of the knee. These VAG signals contain information that can be used to characterize certain pathological aspects of the knee joint. In this paper, we present a noninvasive method for screening knee joint disorders using the VAG signals. The proposed approach uses wavelet packet decompositions and a modified local discriminant bases algorithm to analyze the VAG signals and to identify the highly discriminatory basis functions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of using a combination of multiple dissimilarity measures to arrive at the optimal set of discriminatory basis functions, thereby maximizing the classification accuracy. A database of 89 VAG signals containing 51 normal and 38 abnormal samples were used in this study. The features extracted from the coefficients of the selected basis functions were analyzed and classified using a linear-discriminant-analysis-based classifier. A classification accuracy as high as 80% was achieved using this true nonstationary signal analysis approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".