Differentiated squamous intraepithelial neoplasia associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Differentiated squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (DSIN) has been described in several sites, including the upper aerodigestive tract and vulva, so this study investigated whether it also occurred in the anal canal. METHODS AND RESULTS: All cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) involving the anal canal diagnosed between 2009 and 2015 at our institution were reviewed. Eighty-six cases were included, and 13 (15%) showed features consistent with DSIN: 10 were 'pure' DSIN, and three were 'mixed' DSIN and squamous intraepithelial lesion. DSIN was characterized by atypical keratinocytes limited to the basal/parabasal layers, acanthosis, and a 'cobblestone' appearance. Among specimens with pure DSIN, the surface was flat in eight cases. In five cases, the DSIN was extensive, and associated with deeply invasive SCC requiring radical surgical resection. Immunohistochemically, the epithelia showing changes consistent with DSIN were p16-negative, whereas the invasive component was p16-positive in 12 cases. Both Ki67 and p53 showed strong nuclear positivity in the basal/parabasal layers of DSIN. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive SCC associated with DSIN often presents at an advanced stage of disease, requiring radical surgical treatment. The neoplastic changes in DSIN are limited to the basal/parabasal layers, which may account for the negative diagnoses by anal cytopathology and late clinical diagnosis. The recognition of anal DSIN is important in order to avoid underdiagnosis in superficial biopsies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".