Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure and Anemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Substantial evidence suggests that anemia is an independent risk factor for worse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). The Study of Anemia in Heart Failure Trial (STAMINA-HeFT) is the largest multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to date evaluating the effect of treating anemia in HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (N=319) with symptomatic HF, left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%, and hemoglobin > or = 9.0 g/dL and < or = 12.5 g/dL were randomized (double-blind) to placebo (N=157) or darbepoetin alfa (N=162) subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 1 year (target hemoglobin, 14.0+/-1.0 g/dL). The primary end point was change from baseline to week 27 in treadmill exercise time. Secondary end points were change from baseline in New York Heart Association class and quality of life at week 27. An additional prespecified efficacy analysis included the time to death by any cause or first HF-related hospitalization by 1 year. At baseline, the median (interquartile range) hemoglobin was 11.4 (10.9, 12.0) g/dL. At week 27, darbepoetin alfa treatment increased median (interquartile range) hemoglobin by 1.8 (1.1, 2.5) g/dL (placebo, 0.3 [-0.2, 1.0] g/dL; P<0.001). Of the patients treated with darbepoetin alfa, 85% achieved 2 consecutive hemoglobin levels of 14.0+/-1.0 g/dL during the study and experienced a hemoglobin increase of > or = 1.0 g/dL from baseline. By intent-to-treat analysis, darbepoetin alfa treatment did not significantly improve exercise duration, New York Heart Association class, or quality of life score compared with placebo. A nonsignificant trend was observed toward a lower risk of all-cause mortality or first HF hospitalization in darbepoetin alfa-treated patients compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43, 1.08; P=0.10). Occurrences of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with symptomatic HF and anemia, treatment with darbepoetin alfa was not associated with significant clinical benefits. Darbepoetin alfa treatment was well tolerated and effectively raised hemoglobin. A trend of lower risk of morbidity and mortality was observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".