MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106393245 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-57-s2-30

Stream temperature responses to forest harvest and debris flows in western Cascades, Oregon

2000· article· en· W2106393245 on OpenAlex
Sherri L. Johnson, Julia Jones

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRiparian zoneEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)ForestryRiparian forestDrainage basinEcologyGeographyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stream temperature controls the rates of many biotic and abiotic processes and is influenced by changes in streamside land use practices. We compiled historic stream temperature data and reestablished study sites in three small basins in the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest in the western Cascades, Oregon, to reexamine the effects on and re- covery of stream temperatures following removal of riparian vegetation. Maximum stream temperatures increased 7°C and occurred earlier in the summer after clear-cutting and burning in one basin and after debris flows and patch-cutting in another. Diurnal fluctuations in June increased from approximately 2 to 8°C. Stream temperatures in both basins gradually returned to preharvest levels after 15 years. The influence of the primary factor controlling stream tempera - tures, shortwave solar radiation, was amplified following removal of riparian vegetation, and conduction between stream water and nearby soils or substrates also appeared to be an important factor. Shifts in the timing of summer maxima and greater increases in early summer stream temperatures could impact sensitive stages of aquatic biota. Resume : La temperature des cours d'eau regit le rythme de nombreux processus biotiques et abiotiques, et se trouve sous l'influence des changements dans les pratiques d'amenagement du territoire sur les rives. Nous avons compile les donnees historiques sur la temperature des cours d'eau et retabli des stations d'etude dans trois petits bassins de la fo - ret experimentale H.J. Andrews, dans l'ouest des Cascades (Oregon), pour reexaminer les effets de l'enlevement de la vegetation riveraine sur la temperature des cours d'eau, et le retablissement subsequent. Les temperatures maximales des cours d'eau ont augmente de 7°C, et les augmentations se sont produites plus tot dans l'ete, apres la coupe a blanc et le brulage dans un bassin, et apres des apports de debris et du jardinage par bouquets dans un autre. Les fluctua- tions diurnes en juin ont augmente d'environ 2 a 8°C. Dans les deux bassins, les temperatures des cours d'eau sont graduellement revenues aux niveaux pre-exploitation au bout de 15 ans. L'influence du principal facteur regissant la temperature des cours d'eau, le rayonnement solaire a ondes courtes, a ete amplifiee par suite de l'elimination de la ve- getation riveraine, et la conduction entre l'eau de la riviere et les sols ou les substrats adjacents semblait aussi un fac- teur important. Les changements dans l'occurrence des maximums d'ete, et les augmentations plus fortes des temperatures des cours d'eau au debut de l'ete, pourraient avoir un impact sur les stades vulnerables du biote aqua- tique. (Traduit par la Redaction) Johnson and Jones 39

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it