Vegetation responses to conifer encroachment in a western Cascade meadow: a chronosequence approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conifer invasion of mountain meadows is pervasive in western North America, but its consequences for plant composition and diversity have not been studied. We used a chronosequence approach to reconstruct temporal patterns of vegetation change in response to ~200 years of conifer encroachment of a dry, montane meadow in the western Cascade Range, Oregon. Tree age distributions, forest structure, light, and vegetation composition were determined for three hundred and fifty-six 10 m × 10 m samples representing a gradient from open meadow to old forest (>90 years). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling revealed strong turnover in species composition from open meadow to old forest. Ordination axes were highly correlated with light availability and density/basal area of encroaching grand fir, Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl., and lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. Cover of meadow species declined steeply with establishment of A. grandis ; richness declined more gradually and extirpations of meadow species were rare. Forest herbs colonized within two decades of tree establishment and within 60–80 years dominated the understory flora. In contrast with meadow species, changes in richness and cover of forest herbs were weakly related to changes in forest structure. Rapid replacement of meadow by forest species and long-term effects of trees on soils may limit potential for restoration of these unique habitats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".