Resistance of colorectal cancer cells to 5-FUdR and 5-FU caused by Mycoplasma infection.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an antineoplastic drug that targets thymidylate synthase (TS). Tumour cells can develop resistance to anti-TS drugs by a variety of mechanisms including up-regulation of TS protein and alterations in drug uptake and degradation. The possible mechanisms of the observed rapid development of resistance to the pyrimidine analogs 5-FUdR and 5-FU in cultured HCT116 colon cancer cells were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell survival was determined in resistant and control HCT116 cells treated with 5-FUdR and 5-FU for 7 days. The ability of the cells to take up and metabolize these drugs was determined by Western blotting and [3H]thymidine incorporation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Resistant HCT116 cells were 5- and 100-fold more resistant to killing by 5-FU and 5-FUdR, respectively, than the parental cells and exhibited impaired uptake. Although the HCT116R cells were initially Mycoplasma free, a low level of Mycoplasma contamination was found in these cells after several weeks in culture. Sensitivity to 5-FUdR was restored by treatment with an anti-Mycoplasma antibiotic. Our observations emphasize the need for frequent testing for Mycoplasma contamination in any cell line under investigation for resistance to anti-TS drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".