Vessel-specific rate of vasorelaxation is slower in diabetic rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rate of adjustment of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation was examined in the aorta, iliac and femoral arteries of eight control and eight diabetic rats with and without supplementation with vitamin C. Vessels were constricted using 10(-5) M phenylephrine (PE) and relaxed with 10(-4) M acetylcholine (ACh condition) or 10(-4) M ACh plus 10(-4) M vitamin C (ACh + vitamin C condition) in a myography system. Vasorelaxation was modelled as a mono-exponential function using a non-linear regression analysis. The adjustment (τ) of vasorelaxation was faster in control (6.6 ± 3.2 s) compared to diabetic rats (8.4 ± 3.4 s) (p < 0.05). The time-to-steady-state tended to be shorter in control (32.0 ± 13.9 s) compared to diabetic rats (38.0 ± 15.0 s) (p = 0.1). ACh + vitamin C did not speed the vasorelaxation response. The τ for vasorelaxation was shorter in the femoral (6.5 ± 2.7 s) and iliac (6.8 ± 2.5 s) compared to the aorta (9.2 ± 4.2 s) (p < 0.05). The rate of vasorelaxation was greater in the femoral (3.2 ± 1.4%·s(-1)) compared to the iliac (2.0 ± 1.0%·s(-1)) and aorta (1.1 ± 0.4%·s(-1)) in both groups and in the iliac compared to the aorta (p < 0.05) in the control group. In conclusion, the vasorelaxation response was vessel specific with a slower rate of adjustment in diabetic compared to control animals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".