Modulation of Absence Seizures by the GABA<sub>A</sub> Receptor: A Critical Role for Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 4 (mGluR4)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental absence seizures are associated with perturbations in the presynaptic release of GABA and glutamate within thalamocortical circuitry. The release of both glutamate and GABA is regulated by group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Therefore, we examined the susceptibility of mice lacking the mGluR4 subtype of mGluR (mGluR4(-/-)) versus their wild-type controls (mGluR4(+/+)) to absence seizures induced either by gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) or the GABA(B) agonist (-) baclofen or by low doses of the GABA(A) receptor (GABA(A)R) antagonists pentylenetetrazole, bicuculline, or picrotoxin. There was no difference between mGluR4(-/-) and mGluR4(+/+) mice in threshold to absence seizures induced by either GHB or (-) baclofen. In contrast, the mGluR4(-/-) mice were markedly resistant to absence seizures induced by low doses of GABA(A)R antagonists. No differences were observed between mGluR4(-/-) and mGluR4(+/+) mice in threshold to clonic or tonic seizures induced by higher doses of GABA(A)R antagonists, strychnine, or electroshock, indicating that seizure resistance in the mGluR4(-/-) mice was restricted solely to absence seizures. The resistance of mGluR4(-/-) mice to absence seizures induced by GABA(A)R antagonists was mimicked by bilateral administration of a mGluR4 antagonist into the nucleus reticularis thalami (nRT) of mGluR4(+/+) mice. Conversely, intra-nRT administration of a mGluR4 agonist in mGluR4(+/+) mice exacerbated GABA(A)R-induced absence seizures. These data indicate that the presence of mGluR4 within nRT is critical to GABAergic modulation of thalamocortical synchronization in normal and pathological states, such as generalized absence epilepsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".