Dynamics of Penicillin‐Susceptible Clones in Invasive Pneumococcal Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a 10-year period, 1987-1997, there was a >4-fold increase in the rate of pneumococcal bacteremia in Sweden. Invasive pneumococcal isolates (n=1136), which were obtained from 18 Swedish clinical microbiology laboratories from 1987 through 1997, and other national and international isolates were serotyped, and their clonal relationships were determined by molecular typing. The increase in invasive pneumococcal disease in Sweden during this period was associated particularly with an increase in isolates of serotypes 1 and 14. A 3-fold increase of type 14 was seen from 1987 through 1992, and a 10-fold increase of type 1 occurred from 1992 through 1997. One dominating penicillin-susceptible clone of type 14 was responsible for the increase of type 14 during the first 5 years. This clone also was found in Canada and the United States and was shown by multilocus sequence typing to correspond to a previously identified hyper-virulent clone. A novel penicillin-susceptible clone of type 1, which was not found among invasive isolates from 1987 or 1992, was responsible for the increase of serotype 1 during the last 5 years. These results illustrate the ability of virulent penicillin-susceptible pneumococcal clones to emerge and spread rapidly within a country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".