The role of C1GALT1C1 in lipopolysaccharide-induced IgA1 aberrant O-glycosylation in IgA nephropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: IgA1 aberrant O-glycosylation is one of the main pathogenetic features of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). This study attempted to determine the role of C1GALT1C1 in aberrant IgA1 O-glycosylation induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and identify potential therapeutic targets in IgAN. METHODS: Lymphocytes isolated from 22 patients with IgAN and 17 normal controls were cultured for 3 to 7 days with or without LPS and 5-azacytidine (5-AZA). Expression levels of C1GALT1C1 mRNA and protein were measured by real-time PCR and Western blot analysis, respectively. Concentration of IgA1 and level of O-glycosylation were determined by ELISA and Vicia villosa (VV) lectin-binding assay. Correlation analysis was performed between the expression of C1GALT1C1 protein and IgA1 O-glycosylation. RESULTS: Lymphocytes from patients with IgAN secreted more IgA1 than that from normal controls after LPS stimulation (P=0.26, 0.002 and 0.005 on the 3rd, 5th and 7th day, respectively) which could be inhibited by 5-AZA (P=0.001, 0.025 and 0.001 on the 3rd, 5th and 7th day, respectively). Moreover, LPS stimulation could obviously inhibit C1GALT1C1 expression in patients with IgAN (decreased by 71%, 82% and 92% on the 3rd, 5th and 7th day, respectively; P < 0.001), and cause a significant decrease of IgA1 O-glycosylation compared with normal controls (P=0.004, 0.003 and 0.03 on the 3rd, 5th and 7th day, respectively). When 5-AZA was added, the level of C1GALT1C1 expression increased dramatically (1.98, 5.53 and 8.97 times on the 3rd, 5th and 7th day, respectively; P < 0.001) along with an increase of IgA1 O-glycosylation (P=0.295, 0.09 and 0.003 on the 3rd, 5th and 7th day, respectively). However, normal controls showed no significant change in C1GALT1C1 expression and IgA1 O-glycosylation after LPS stimulation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: LPS induced IgA1 aberrant O-glycosylation and suppressed C1GALT1C1 expression in patients with IgAN. Upregulation of C1GALT1C1 expression by 5-AZA could reverse the IgA1 aberrant O-glycosylation. These results suggest that C1GALT1C1 may play a key role in the regulation of IgA1 O-glycosylation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".