MDS-based Multi-axial Dimensionality Reduction Model for Human Action Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present an original and efficient method of human action recognition in a video sequence. The proposed model is based on the generation and fusion of a set of prototypes generated from different view-points of the data cube of the video sequence. More precisely, each prototype is generated by using a multidimensional scaling (MDS) based nonlinear dimensionality reduction technique both along the temporal axis but also along the spatial axis (row and column) of the binary video sequence of 2D silhouettes. This strategy aims at modeling each human action in a low dimensional space, as a trajectory of points or a specific curve, for each viewpoint of the video cube in a complementary way. A simple K-NN classifier is then used to classify the prototype, for a given viewpoint, associated with each action to be recognized and then the fusion of the classification results for each viewpoint allow us to significantly improve the recognition rate performance. The experiments of our approach have been conducted on the publicly available Weizmann data-set and show the sensitivity of the proposed recognition system to each individual viewpoint and the efficiency of our multi-viewpoint based fusion approach compared to the best existing state-of-the-art human action recognition methods recently proposed in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".