Rescattering contributions to rare<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math>-meson decays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several $B$ and ${B}_{s}$ decays have been observed that have been cited as evidence for exchange ($E$), penguin annihilation ($PA$), and annihilation ($A$) processes, such as $\overline{b}d\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\overline{u}u$, $\overline{b}s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\overline{u}u$, and $\overline{b}u\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{W}^{*}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\overline{c}s$, respectively. These amplitudes are normally thought to be suppressed, as they involve the spectator quark in the weak interaction and thus should be proportional to the $B$-meson decay constant ${f}_{B}$. However, as pointed out a number of years ago, they can also be generated by rescattering from processes whose amplitudes do not involve ${f}_{B}$, such as color-favored tree amplitudes. In this paper we investigate a number of processes such as ${B}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{+}{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, ${B}_{s}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, and ${B}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{D}_{s}^{+}\ensuremath{\phi}$, and identify promising states from which they can be generated by rescattering. We find that $E$-and $PA$-type processes are characterized, respectively, by amplitudes ranging from 5% to 10% and from 15% to 20% with respect to the largest amplitude from which they can rescatter. Based on this regularity, using approximate flavor SU(3) symmetry in some cases and time-reversal invariance in others, we predict the branching fractions for a large number of as-yet-unseen $B$ and ${B}_{s}$ decays in an extensive range from order ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}9}$ to ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".