MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106692234 · doi:10.1183/09031936.06.00146005

A 46-year-old female with dyspnoea, stridor and chronic cough

2006· article· en· W2106692234 on OpenAlexaff
Nimrod Maimon, Theodore K. Marras, Peter H. Hwang, Narinder Paul, Shaf Keshavjee, Charles K. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStridorChronic coughMedicinePediatricsPhysical therapyAnesthesiaInternal medicineAsthmaAirway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 46-yr-old female presented to the chest clinic with chronic dry cough and increasing dyspnoea on exertion. The patient's symptoms had deteriorated over the past 15 months and, at presentation, the patient developed dyspnoea after only 50 yards of walking. She had experienced multiple emergency department visits and frequent admissions to the hospital because of breathing difficulties. Also, during the last year, she experienced recurrent respiratory infections with a frequency of one to two infections per month. The patient received a diagnosis of bronchial asthma and was treated with short courses of systemic steroids, multiple inhalers and courses of antibiotics; resulting in only mild and temporary improvement in her symptoms. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) 15 months earlier had shown a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 1.5 L (84% predicted). The patient's past medical history was unremarkable. Specifically, there was no history of childhood asthma or frequent infections. She was an ex-smoker with 15 pack-yrs. Family history, environmental allergies and occupational exposures were all unremarkable. At presentation her medications included salmeterol-fluticasone inhaler, tiotropium, montelukast, prednisone 30 mg daily and pantoprazole. The patient appeared well with a blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg, heart rate of 80·min-1 and regular, respiratory rate of 18·min-1. Her saturation on room air was at 95%. Head and neck examination did not demonstrate lymphadenopathy or signs of chondral inflammation. Her cardiovascular examination revealed a normal jugular vein pulse with normal heart sounds and no pedal oedema. Respiratory examination demonstrated absence of clubbing and no evidence of wheezing or crackle. However, forced expiration produced an audible stridor sound. Spirometry demonstrated a forced vital capacity (FVC) of 1.7 L (75% pred), FEV1 0.65 L (25% pred), and FEV1/FVC 35%. A flow/volume curve is shown in figure 1⇓. Diffusing …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory JournalSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207