MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The JR blood group system: genetic and molecular investigations

2012· article· en· W2106702459 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gail Coghlan

Bibliographic record

VenueISBT Science Series · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeSanger sequencingSNPgenomic DNAHaplotypeMolecular biologyGeneMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Jr a is a high‐incidence erythrocyte antigen previously designated ISBT 901.005. The rare Jr(a−) phenotype appeared to be inherited as an autosomal recessive trait, but the gene controlling the expression of Jr a was not known. We conducted genetic and molecular investigations in an attempt to resolve this issue. Aim This lecture and accompanying manuscript will detail the homozygosity by descent (HBD) gene mapping strategy we used to establish that ABCG2 null alleles define the Jr(a−) phenotype (Zelinski et al., Nat Genet 2012;44:131–132). Materials and Methods Genomic DNA was genotyped for single nucleotide polymorphism s (SNPs) using a Human GeneChip (Affymetrix, 250K Nsp I) Mapping array. The six Jr (a−) study subjects were two Caucasian sisters, two Asian siblings and two unrelated Asian individuals referred for serologic testing. Anti‐Jr a was identified in the plasma from four of the six. Intronic primers flanking exons 2–16 of ABCG2 were designed and used for PCR amplification. Both the forward and reverse strands of each purified product were Sanger sequenced at The Centre for Applied Genomics (Toronto, Canada). Results Analysis of the SNP genotype data revealed that the Caucasian sisters were identically homozygous for large tracts of consecutive SNPs in seven different chromosomal regions; chromosome 1q (3·3 Mb), 3q (8·8 Mb), 4q (28·9 Mb), 7q (10·5 and 7·7 Mb), 9q (3·1 Mb) and 10q (2·0 Mb). DNA from the four Asian individuals did not consistently contain homozygous SNP haplotypes in any of these regions except for chromosome 4q22.1. In this region, the siblings and one unrelated Asian had blocks of homozygosity that overlapped for approximately 400 000 bp and were identical to each other, but, different from the Caucasians. The remaining unrelated Asian was homozygous (approximately 520 000 bp) for a third SNP haplotype. The 4q22.1 region of homozygosity identified in all six study subjects contains four validated genes, only one of which, ABCG2 , is known to be highly expressed on erythrocytes. DNA sequencing revealed that homozygosity for each of the three SNP haplotypes corresponded with homozygosity for a different nonsense (c.736C>T or c.376C>T) or missense (c.34G>A) mutation in ABCG2 . Conclusion The genetic and molecular evidence revealed by this study proves that ABCG2 null alleles define the Jr(a−) blood group phenotype. Independently, our French colleagues established that Jr a was carried on the ABCG2 protein (Saison et al., Nat Genet 2012;44:174–177). Based on these results the JR blood group system (ISBT 032) has been established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISBT Science SeriesSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207