Numerical Investigation of Three-Dimensional Laminar Wall Jet of Non-Newtonian Fluid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A numerical investigation was performed for three-dimensional laminar wall jet flows of non-Newtonian fluid with power-law index, n = 0.7 at two Reynolds numbers. A colocated finite volume based in-house CFD code was used to solve the complete nonlinear incompressible Navier-Stokes equation. The results showed that the spread of the jet in both the transverse and spanwise directions, decay of the local maximum streamwise velocity, and the skin friction coefficient depend strongly on Reynolds number. The jet half-width in the transverse direction is significantly higher than in the spanwise direction. Depending on the specific Reynolds number, the apparent viscosities were up to three orders of magnitude higher than the dynamic viscosity of water. Significant differences were observed among the profiles in the inner region when the results were compare with Newtonian fluid, n = 1.0. Nomenclature Cf = skin friction coefficient d = inlet pipe diameter n = power-law index p = pressure r = local radius which is a function of y and z
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".