MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106736877 · doi:10.2118/102094-pa

Quantifying Resources for the Surmont Lease with 2D Mapping and Multivariate Statistics

2008· article· en· W2106736877 on OpenAlexafffund
Weishan Ren, Clayton V. Deutsch, David Garner, Travis J. Wheeler, Jean-François Richy, Emmanuel Mus

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsChevron (Canada)University of AlbertaConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsGeologyBoreholePetroleum engineeringLeaseGeostatisticsResource (disambiguation)Environmental scienceStatisticsGeotechnical engineeringSpatial variabilityComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The McMurray formation consists of heterogeneous Cretaceous-bitumen-saturated sands. The reservoirs are thick and laterally extensive in the main fairways. Many commercial projects are in the early stages of development. Resources too deep to mine are considering steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) (Butler 1991). Detailed high-resolution 3D geostatistical modeling is useful for individual well-pair or pad flow simulation, but is neither practical nor necessary for resource assessment across large areas. A methodology for resource assessment is developed from a geostatistical study on the Surmont lease. The uncertainty in more than 30 correlated variables is calculated on a dense 2D grid using all available information including wells, seismic, and geologic trends. The correlation structure between the variables is modeled under a multivariate Gaussian model. The local distributions of uncertainty have been checked with cross validation and with more than 100 new wells drilled during the last two drilling seasons. Resource uncertainty across the entire lease area and a number of arbitrary development areas is derived from the 2D maps of uncertainty. A combined P -field/LU simulation approach is used; the global uncertainty is consistent with the local uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & EngineeringSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207