MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106753785 · doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-14-00026

Evaluation of community-based interventions to improve TB case detection in a rural district of Tanzania

2014· article· en· W2106753785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charlotte Colvin, Jackson Mugyabuso, Godwin Munuo, John Lyimo, Eyal Oren, Z. Mkomwa, M.H. Makame, Atuswege Mwangomale, Vishnu Mahamba, Lisa Mueller, Darcy Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Health Science and Practice · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsMedicineTanzaniaTuberculosisPsychological interventionFamily medicineCase findingQuarter (Canadian coin)SputumMedical emergencyEnvironmental healthNursingSocioeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Tanzania, people with tuberculosis (TB) commonly self-medicate or visit traditional healers before seeking formal medical care. Between 2009 and 2011, we piloted a community-based project in Kisarawe District to improve TB case notification. The project trained 15 traditional healers and 15 pharmacists to identify and refer individuals with TB symptoms to diagnostic facilities. In addition, the project trained 2 community members to collect and fix sputum from symptomatic individuals onto slides, which they then delivered by bicycle to the nearest diagnostic facility. To determine effectiveness, we analyzed routine case detection data and referrals from traditional healers and pharmacists and conducted a cross-sectional survey of recently diagnosed smear-positive TB patients (N = 150) to understand their treatment-seeking behavior. From 2009 to 2011, smear-positive TB case notification increased by 68% in Kisarawe District, from 28/100,000 to 47/100,000, even while TB case notification nationally stayed the same (at approximately 14/100,000). The traditional healers and pharmacists referred 434 people with presumptive TB to diagnostic facilities, 419 of whom (97%) went to the facilities; of those who went to facilities for testing, 104 people (25%) were diagnosed with TB. The percentage of new TB case notifications that were referred through the network ranged from 38% to 70% per reporting quarter. Sputum fixers collected and delivered specimens from 178 individuals, 17 of whom (10%) were diagnosed with TB. Almost 60% of surveyed smear-positive TB patients first visited a pharmacist or traditional healer before seeking care at a diagnostic facility. These results prompted scale up of community interventions to 9 more districts in 2011 and to another 26 districts in 2013. Establishing referral networks that bring TB information and services closer to community members can contribute to improved TB case notification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Health Science and PracticeSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207