MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106828276 · doi:10.1139/p05-010

Precision measurements of fine and hyperfine structure in lithium I and II

2005· article· en· W2106828276 on OpenAlexaffvenue
W. A. van Wijngaarden

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperfine structurePhysicsFine-structure constantLithium (medication)Atomic physicsIsotopeEffective nuclear chargeNuclear structureFine structureIsotopes of lithiumIonComputational physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in modeling Li I and II in conjunction with improved experimental techniques have enabled precise tests of quantum electrodynamics. For Li+, the hyperfine intervals of the 1s2s 3S1 and 1s2p 3P0,1,2 states are in excellent agreement with theory. A recent measurement of the 1s2p 3P1,2 fine-structure interval also agrees well with the calculated value and resolves a discrepancy found by two prior experiments. For neutral lithium, discrepancies exist among the results of various experiments for the 6,7Li D1 isotope shift and the 2P fine structure. However, all of the fine-structure measurements are several MHz larger than the theoretical value. Prospects for future experiments to improve the determination of the fine-structure constant and the relative 6,7Li nuclear charge radii are discussed. PACS Nos.: 32.10.Fn, 31.30.Gs, 42.62.Fi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207