MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106830833 · doi:10.1109/dcc.2002.999970

On optimal multi-resolution scalar quantization

2003· article· en· W2106830833 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsQuantization (signal processing)AlgorithmTree (set theory)Binary numberDiscrete mathematicsBinary treeWeightingBinPhysicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Any scalar quantizer of 2/sup h/ bins, where h is a positive integer, can be structured by a balanced binary quantizer tree T of h levels. Any pruned subtree /spl tau/ of T corresponds to an operational rate R(/spl tau/) and distortion D(/spl tau/) pair. Denote by S/sub n/ the set of all pruned subtrees of n leaf nodes, 1/spl les/n/spl les/2/sup h/. We consider the problem of designing a 2/sup h/-bin scalar quantizer that minimizes the weighted average distortion D~=/spl Sigma//sub n=1//sup 2(h)/ D(/spl tau/)W(n), where W(n) is a weighting function in the size of pruned subtrees (or the resolution of the underlying quantizer). We present an O(hN/sup 3/) algorithm to solve the underlying optimization problem (N is the number of points of the histogram that represents the source probability mass function), and call the resulting quantizer optimal multi-resolution scalar quantizer in the sense that it minimizes a global distortion measure averaged over all quantization resolutions of T. Interestingly, a similar quantizer design problem studied by Brunk et al. (1996) is a special case of our formulation, and can thus be solved exactly and efficiently using our algorithm. Furthermore, we present an algorithm to generate a sequence of 2/sup h/ nested pruned subtrees of T, from the root of T to the entire tree T itself, which minimizes an expected distortion over a range of operational rates. The resulting nested pruned subtree sequence generates an optimized embedded (rate-distortion scalable) code stream with maximum granularity of 2/sup h/ quantization stages, as opposed to existing successively refinable quantizers, such as the popular bit-plane coding scheme, which offer only h stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207