First Report of <i>Tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid</i> in <i>Petunia hybrida</i> from the United States of America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In November 2005, 13 accessions of Petunia hybrida from the United States of America entered the post-entry quarantine station of the Plant Protection Service in the Netherlands. The plants were inspected and tested for quarantine organisms according to Directives 95/44 and 97/46 of the European Union. No virus and viroid symptoms were observed in the imported plants or in mechanically inoculated plants of Chenopodium quinoa, Nicotiana benthamiana, and N. occidentalis-P1 (3). Testing for pospiviroids by return-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (1) and reverse transcriptase-PCR with universal pospiviroid primers Pospi1-RE/FW (2) indicated the presence of pospiviroids in 3 and 11 P. hybrida accessions, respectively. The 196-bp amplicons of six accessions were sequenced. Sequence analysis showed the highest identity for all amplicons to both isolates of Tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid (TCDVd) in NCBI GenBank, Accession Nos. AF162131and AY372399, from Canada and the United States, respectively. Additional RT-PCRs with the Pospi1-RE/FW primers in opposite order and the semi-universal pospiviroid primers Vid-RE/FW (2) for one isolate, followed by sequence analysis, confirmed the identity as TCDVd. The isolate consisted of 359 nucleotides (GenBank Accession No. DQ859013) and showed sequence identities of 98.6 and 96.1% to the Canadian and American tomato isolates of this viroid, respectively. The next highest sequence identity was 90.0% to two accessions of Potato spindle tuber viroid (GenBank Accession Nos. AJ593449 and AY962324). On the basis of these results, the viroid from P. hybrida was identified as TCDVd. To our knowledge, this is the first report of TCDVd in this plant species. Reference: (1) J. W. Roenhorst et al. EPPO Bull. 30:453, 2000. (2) J. Th. J. Verhoeven et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 110:823, 2004. (3) J. Th. J. Verhoeven and J. W. Roenhorst. EPPO Bull. 33:305, 2003.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".