Organosulfur oxoacids. Part 1. Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of dimethylaminoiminomethanesulfinic acid (DMAIMSA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the major metabolites of dimethylthiourea, dimethylaminoiminomethanesulfinic acid (DMAIMSA), was synthesized by controlled oxidation of dimethylthiourea using hydrogen peroxide. The crystal structure was determined by X-ray crystallography. It is a zwitterionic species in its solid form, with a positive charge delocalized around an sp2-hybridized carbon center and two nitrogen atoms. It crystallizes in the triclinic P[Formula: see text] space group. The CS bond, at 1.880(2) Å, is much longer than a typical CS single bond length of 1.79 Å. It is also longer than the one observed in thiourea trioxide, a comparable sulfonic acid. This CS bond is stable in acidic conditions and is easily cleaved in basic conditions or in the presence of suitable nucleophiles that can attack the positively disposed carbon center. DMAIMSA is highly reactive and easily decomposes in basic conditions to yield dithionite in the presence of oxygen, whereas in strictly anaerobic conditions it gives a mixture of sulfite and sulfide. The precursor to dithionite, SO2·, is formed from the one-electron oxidation of the sulfoxylate anion, SO22, which results from an initial heterolytic cleavage of the CS bond in DMAIMSA. The sulfur center is oxidized, even by mild oxidants such as aqueous iodine, to sulfate. Key words: thiourea metabolites, synthesis, structure, reactivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".