Spatial and temporal variation of drinking water quality in ten small Quebec utilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comparative study relating to distributed water quality was undertaken in 10 small municipal drinking water utilities in Quebec. All of these utilities apply direct chlorination to surface water or groundwater under the direct influence of surface water without any previous treatment. These utilities were divided into two groups: four utilities that had never or rarely served water violating the provincial drinking water microbiological standards (relating to fecal and (or) total coliform bacteria) and six utilities that very often infringed upon said standards. The objective of this study was to identify key parameters responsible for the differences between the two groups of utilities, to explore the capacity of studied utilities to simultaneously and effectively handle the acute disease risk associated with microorganisms and the chronic health hazard linked to chlorination by-products and to identify the parameters upon which it may be possible to act to achieve better water quality in each of the two utility groups. The study includes comparisons of characteristics of water quality at the source, chlorination conditions in the plant, and water quality from the entrance to the extremity of the distribution system. Results show that the differences between the two groups of utilities are associated essentially with maintained chlorine residuals and heterotrophic plate count bacteria populations in corresponding distribution systems and, to a lesser extent, to the applied chlorine doses. Subsequent multivariate analyses allowed identification of variables (i.e., factors) upon which utility managers may act to improve the quality of distributed water in each group of utilities. For the group of utilities that had very little or no violation, these factors are related to disinfection levels, whereas for the group that often violated quality standards, raw water natural organic matter content reduction through source water protection and raised chlorine doses and residuals appear to be the factors that may lead to better microbiological quality of distributed water. Key words: drinking water, water quality, distribution systems, small utilities, Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".