MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106914396 · doi:10.2514/6.2005-2177

Fluid-Structure Interaction Issues in Deformation Based Subsea Propulsion Systems

2005· article· en· W2106914396 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaPropulsionDeformation (meteorology)Aerospace engineeringFluid–structure interactionComputer scienceMarine engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceStructural engineeringFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of a fluid-structure interaction framework is described. The framework is modular in nature, which allows for the use of existing commercial and research solvers and is used to study propulsion systems that use shape deformation such as SCUBA fins. The framework is comprised of various modules which are described and, in the case of the fluid solver module, validated. The fluid solver was used to resolve the turbulent flowfield about a 2-D circular cylinder at a Reynolds number of 140,000. The results obtained compare favourably to those reported in the literature. The fluid-structure interaction framework is then used to simulate a pitching and heaving rigid 3-D fin and a flexible fin undergoing the same motion. The results are then compared and show the eect that even limited flexibility has on the performance of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it