MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106944202 · doi:10.1109/crv.2011.17

A PSO Accelerated Immune Particle Filter for Dynamic State Estimation

2011· article· en· W2106944202 on OpenAlexafffund
Sohail Akhtar, Azhana Ahmad, Eihab Abdel‐Rahman, T. Naqvi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArtificial Immune Systems Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of WaterlooDalhousie University
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationRobustness (evolution)Local optimumParticle filterMathematical optimizationComputer scienceDegeneracy (biology)Monte Carlo methodControl theory (sociology)Filter (signal processing)MathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Particle Filter (PF) is a flexible and powerful Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) technique to solve the nonlinear state/parameter estimation problems. The generic PF suffers due to degeneracy or sample impoverishment, which adversely affects its performance. In order to overcome this issue of the generic PF, a Particle Swarm Optimization accelerated Immune Particle Filter (PSO-acc-IPF) is proposed in this work. It combines the robustness and the diversified search capability of the Immune Algorithm (IA) and the speed and the computational efficiency of the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in pursuing the global optimal solution. Mutation plays the key role in the proposed algorithm to help avoid the local optima and search for a global best solution. A two stage mutation operation is proposed. The first stage, with a high mutation rate, helps in exploring a larger solution space and the second stage, with a smaller mutation rate, helps in local optimal search. Later on, PSO is employed to accelerate the convergence speed. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, its performance is compared with the generic PF and PSO Particle Filter (PSO-PF). The simulation results have demonstrated better robustness in state estimation for switching dynamic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Immune Systems ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207