MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106948453 · doi:10.1144/sp328.10

Geological evolution of the NW corner of the Caribbean Plate

2009· article· en· W2106948453 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo A. Valls

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsPyrogenesis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCaribbean regionPlate tectonicsPaleontologyGeographyLatin AmericansPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Caribbean Plate consists of a plateau basalt, formed probably in the Middle Cretaceous, complicated by a continental block, Chortís, several magmatic arcs, strike–slip motions along major fault systems such as the Motagua–Polochic fault zone in Guatemala, the pull-apart basin of the Cayman Trough and subduction zones below Central America and the Lesser Antilles. Five major collisional events have been identified: (i) Late Paleocene–Middle Eocene collision of the Greater Antilles with the Bahamas platform; (ii) Late Cretaceous collision of Chortís with the Maya Block; (iii) emplacement of nappes upon the Venezuelan foreland in the Cenozoic; (iv) collision of the Western Cordillera oceanic complex with the Central Cordillera of Colombia; and (v) Miocene collision of the eastern Costa Rica–Panama arc with the Western Cordillera. All these ‘orogenic events’ show an eastward movement of the Caribbean Plate relative to the Americas. Migration of the Jamaica Block from the Pacific caused obduction of the oldest ophiolites of Huehuetenango at the western end of the Polochic–Río Negro faults in Guatemala. South-southwest migration of the Chortís Block from west of Mexico and northward towards the Maya Block destroyed a trench associated with the Motagua–Jalomáx fault system and caused the Chuacús Orogeny, emplacing Guatemalan ophiolite complexes and metamorphosing the rocks from the Chuacús Series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207