Vasopressin Preferentially Depresses Excitatory Over Inhibitory Synaptic Transmission in the Rat Supraoptic Nucleus In Vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endogenous arginine-vasopressin (AVP) in the supraoptic nucleus is known to decrease the firing rate of some supraoptic nucleus neurones. To determine a possible mechanism by which this locally released AVP produces this change in neuronal excitability, we investigated the effects of AVP on evoked excitatory (e.p.s.c.) and inhibitory post-synaptic (i.p.s.c.) responses recorded in magnocellular neurones in a hypothalamic slice preparation, using the perforated-patch recording technique. Our data show that AVP produces a dose-dependent decrease in the evoked e.p.s.c. in about 80% of magnocellular neurones tested with an estimated EC50 of about 0.9 microM. The maximum decrease in e.p.s.c. amplitude was about 31% of control and was obtained with an AVP concentration of 2 microM. The AVP-induced synaptic depression was blocked by Manning Compound (MC), a non-selective antagonist of oxytocin (OXT) and vasopressin (AVP) receptors, but not by a selective OXT receptor antagonist. It was not mimicked by desmopressin (ddAVP), a V2-receptor subtype agonist. By contrast, AVP used at the same concentration (2 microM), had no global effect on pharmacologically isolated i.p.s.c.s in the majority of magnocellular neurones tested. These results show that AVP acts in the supraoptic nucleus to reduce excitatory synaptic transmission to magnocellular neurones by activating a non-OXT receptor, presumably the V1 receptor subtype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".