MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2106992761 · doi:10.3317/jraas.2001.040

Losartan may modulate erythropoietin production

2001· article· en· W2106992761 on OpenAlexafffund
Sandra Donnelly, Judith Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersMedical Research CouncilKidney Foundation of Canada
KeywordsLosartanErythropoietinEndocrinologyInternal medicineAngiotensin IIRenal functionRenal blood flowReabsorptionRenal sodium reabsorptionRenin–angiotensin systemChemistryKidneyFiltration fractionBlood pressureMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erythropoietin (Epo) is distinct amongst haematopoietic hormones, in that it is produced remote from the bone marrow. The tissue oxygen pressure required to trigger the Epo gene under physiological conditions is uniquely sited at a restricted area in the kidney termed the critmeter. Angiotensin II (Ang II) increases sodium reabsorption and hence oxygen consumption at any given bloodflow rate; therefore, it may affect the balance of renal oxygen supply vs. demand and hence Epo production. The purpose of this study was to determine whether Epo production is modulated by the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Twenty normal subjects on a controlled sodium and protein diet had glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF)assessed by standard methods of inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance, respectively, at baseline, hourly after the administration of losartan (25 mg) and after each 30 minute period of the infusion of Ang II at doses of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5 ng/kg/minute. The baseline GFR was 115+/-4.0 ml/minute/1.73 m2, RPF 650+/-29 ml/minute/1.73 m2 and Epo 12.4+/-0.8 U/L. In spite of a marked increase in filtration fraction (FF) with Ang II, no changes in serum Epo levels were observed at two hours(11.7+/-1.3 U/L, p=n.s. compared with baseline). After the administration of losartan, there was a variable effect on FF, but a strong correlation of the change in serum Epo concentration and the change in FF(r=0.648, p=0.002), suggesting that the RAS may modulate Epo production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemSame topicErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFrench-language works237,207