MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sacral spinal interneurones and the control of urinary bladder and urethral striated sphincter muscle function

2001· review· en· W2107032720 on OpenAlexaff
S.J. Shefchyk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrethral sphincterUrinationExcitatory postsynaptic potentialInhibitory postsynaptic potentialSpinal cordAnatomyStriated MusclesUrinary bladderSphincterPudendal nerveMedicineElectrophysiologyNeuroscienceUrethraBiologyUrinary systemUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Normally, during bladder filling (continence) and expulsion (micturition) there is a reciprocity between the pattern of activity in the urinary bladder sacral parasympathetic efferents and the somatic motoneurones innervating the striated external urethral sphincter muscle. The co-ordination of this pattern of reciprocal activity appears to be determined by excitatory and inhibitory actions of a variety of segmental afferents and descending systems with sacral spinal actions. These actions may in part be mediated through lower lumbar and sacral excitatory and inhibitory spinal interneurones. Over the past 30 years, both neuroanatomical and electrophysiological approaches have been used to reveal an ever-increasing richness in the neuronal network in the lower spinal cord related to the bladder and striated external urethral sphincter muscle. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of the identified excitatory and inhibitory spinal interneurones hypothesized to be involved in the central networks controlling the sacral bladder parasympathetic preganglionic neurones and striated urethral sphincter motoneurones during continence and micturition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207