MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107038525 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh989

Heparin induced thrombocytopaenia secondary to intraperitoneal heparin exposure

2005· article· en· W2107038525 on OpenAlexaff
Gilaad G. Kaplan, Braden Manns, Kevin McLaughlin

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeparinIntensive care medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type II immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is reported to occur in 2% of individuals exposed to heparin for more than 4 days [1]. HIT has been well described in haemodialysis patients with a similar incidence to non-dialysis patients [2]. Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis are not routinely exposed to heparin during dialysis, and for this reason a switch from haemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis is often considered if HIT occurs in a hemodialysis patient. Previous studies have demonstrated that intraperitoneal heparin does not produce systemic anticoagulation and it has been suggested that a combination of large molecular weight and negative charge prevent systemic absorption of heparin across the peritoneal membrane [3]. However, it is unclear as to whether the reported lack of systemic absorption across the peritoneal membrane protects against the development of HIT. This is an important consideration because in many units it is standard practice to administer intraperitoneal heparin to prevent fibrin clot formation during episodes of peritonitis. In this case report we describe for the first time, to our knowledge, a case of type II HIT in a peritoneal dialysis patient who received intraperitoneal heparin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207