MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integration of CO<sub>2</sub> flux and remotely‐sensed data for primary production and ecosystem respiration analyses in the Northern Great Plains: potential for quantitative spatial extrapolation

2005· article· en· W2107146364 on OpenAlex
Tagir G. Gilmanov, Larry L. Tieszen, Bruce K. Wylie, Albert B. Frank, Marshall R. Haferkamp, Tilden P. Meyers, Jack A. Morgan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Biogeography · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceU.S. Geological SurveyUniversity of LethbridgeUnited States Agency for International Development
KeywordsPhotosynthetically active radiationPrimary productionEcosystem respirationEnvironmental scienceEcosystemAtmospheric sciencesNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexRespirationSoil respirationFlux (metallurgy)Plant functional typeDaytimeEddy covarianceEcologyHydrology (agriculture)Leaf area indexChemistryBiologyBotanyPhotosynthesisGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Aim Extrapolation of tower CO 2 fluxes will be greatly facilitated if robust relationships between flux components and remotely sensed factors are established. Long‐term measurements at five Northern Great Plains locations were used to obtain relationships between CO 2 fluxes and photosynthetically active radiation ( Q ), other on‐site factors, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ( NDVI ) from the SPOT VEGETATION data set. Location CO 2 flux data from the following stations and years were analysed: Lethbridge, Alberta 1998–2001; Fort Peck, MT 2000, 2002; Miles City, MT 2000–01; Mandan, ND 1999–2001; and Cheyenne, WY 1997–98. Results Analyses based on light‐response functions allowed partitioning net CO 2 flux ( F ) into gross primary productivity ( P g ) and ecosystem respiration ( R e ). Weekly averages of daytime respiration, γ day , estimated from light responses were closely correlated with weekly averages of measured night‐time respiration, γ night ( R 2 0.64 to 0.95). Daytime respiration tended to be higher than night‐time respiration, and regressions of γ day on γ night for all sites were different from 1 : 1 relationships. Over 13 site‐years, gross primary production varied from 459 to 2491 g CO 2 m −2 year −1 , ecosystem respiration from 996 to 1881 g CO 2 m −2 year −1 , and net ecosystem exchange from −537 (source) to +610 g CO 2 m −2 year −1 (sink). Maximum daily ecological light‐use efficiencies, ɛ d , max = P g /Q , were in the range 0.014 to 0.032 mol CO 2 (mol incident quanta) −1 . Main conclusions Ten‐day average P g was significantly more highly correlated with NDVI than 10‐day average daytime flux, P d ( R 2 = 0.46 to 0.77 for P g ‐NDVI and 0.05 to 0.58 for P d ‐NDVI relationships). Ten‐day average R e was also positively correlated with NDVI , with R 2 values from 0.57 to 0.77. Patterns of the relationships of P g and R e with NDVI and other factors indicate possibilities for establishing multivariate functions allowing scaling‐up local fluxes to larger areas using GIS data, temporal NDVI, and other factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it