How Scientists’ Communications Helped Mitigate the Psychosocial Effects of the October 2012 Magnitude 7.8 Earthquake near Haida Gwaii, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| July 15, 2015 How Scientists' Communications Helped Mitigate the Psychosocial Effects of the October 2012 Magnitude 7.8 Earthquake near Haida Gwaii, Canada Alison Bird; Alison Bird Natural Resources Canada (Geological Survey of Canada), 9860 West Saanich Road, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2alison.bird@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Maurice Lamontagne Maurice Lamontagne Natural Resources Canada (Geological Survey of Canada), 9860 West Saanich Road, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2alison.bird@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Alison Bird Natural Resources Canada (Geological Survey of Canada), 9860 West Saanich Road, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2alison.bird@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca Maurice Lamontagne Natural Resources Canada (Geological Survey of Canada), 9860 West Saanich Road, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2alison.bird@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © 2015 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2015) 86 (5): 1301–1309. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140231 Article history First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Alison Bird, Maurice Lamontagne; How Scientists' Communications Helped Mitigate the Psychosocial Effects of the October 2012 Magnitude 7.8 Earthquake near Haida Gwaii, Canada. Seismological Research Letters 2015;; 86 (5): 1301–1309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140231 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search The sparsely populated region of Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada (formerly known as the Queen Charlotte Islands) was struck on 27 October 2012 by a magnitude (Mw) 7.8 earthquake—the second largest earthquake in Canada's written history. It was felt throughout British Columbia and into neighboring provinces, territories, and states, as far as 1600 km from the event's rupture zone. Throughout Haida Gwaii, the shaking reportedly lasted 1.5–2 min, with about 30 s of especially strong shaking. Despite there being only light building damage and few, minor injuries, many of the inhabitants of Haida Gwaii found the earthquake... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".