MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107177169 · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm126

Genetic basis of polygenic hypertension

2007· review· en· W2107177169 on OpenAlexafffund
Alan Y. Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Molecular Genetics · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsQuantitative trait locusBiologyEpistasisGenetic architectureMendelian inheritanceFamily-based QTL mappingGeneticsInheritance (genetic algorithm)Multifactorial InheritanceTraitGenome-wide association studyCandidate geneGeneAlleleQuantitative geneticsEvolutionary biologyGenetic variationGene mappingSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Essential hypertension is a common disorder that leads to significant morbidity and mortality; however, the underlying mechanisms have remained elusive. Recent animal model studies have uncovered a complex genetic architecture of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for blood pressure (BP), intricate QTL-QTL interactions and powerful genome regulations that underlie polygenic hypertension. BP, a quantitative trait manifesting as a continuous variation, seems to be controlled by individual 'monogenic' QTLs following Mendelian inheritance. Certain QTLs are functionally organized in epistatic modules that likely participate in pathways and cascades, whereas others belong to independent modules. This understanding provides insights into probable genetic mechanisms underlying essential hypertension. Translation of gene discovery to therapy will require an integrated approach that includes experimental validation of genes in animal models and in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Molecular GeneticsSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207