MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107184682 · doi:10.1002/2015jd023138

Airborne measurements of the atmospheric emissions from a fuel ethanol refinery

2015· article· en· W2107184682 on OpenAlex
J. A. de Gouw, S. A. McKeen, K. C. Aikin, C. A. Brock, Steven S. Brown, J. B. Gilman, M. Graus, T. F. Hanisco, J. S. Holloway, Jennifer Kaiser, Frank N. Keutsch, B. M. Lerner, J. Liao, M. Z. Markovic, A. M. Middlebrook, K.‐E. Min, J. A. Neuman, J. B. Nowak, Jeff Peischl, I. B. Pollack, J. M. Roberts, Thomas B. Ryerson, M. Trainer, Patrick R. Veres, C. Warneke, André Welti, Glenn M. Wolfe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsOil refineryRefineryGasolineEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEthanol fuelFugitive emissionsFuel oilEmission inventoryGreenhouse gasRefining (metallurgy)Fossil fuelBiofuelAir pollutionEnvironmental engineeringChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ethanol made from corn now constitutes approximately 10% of the fuel used in gasoline vehicles in the U.S. The ethanol is produced in over 200 fuel ethanol refineries across the nation. We report airborne measurements downwind from Decatur, Illinois, where the third largest fuel ethanol refinery in the U.S. is located. Estimated emissions are compared with the total point source emissions in Decatur according to the 2011 National Emissions Inventory (NEI‐2011), in which the fuel ethanol refinery represents 68.0% of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), 50.5% of nitrogen oxides (NO x = NO + NO 2 ), 67.2% of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and 95.9% of ethanol emissions. Emissions of SO 2 and NO x from Decatur agreed with NEI‐2011, but emissions of several VOCs were underestimated by factors of 5 (total VOCs) to 30 (ethanol). By combining the NEI‐2011 with fuel ethanol production numbers from the Renewable Fuels Association, we calculate emission intensities, defined as the emissions per ethanol mass produced. Emission intensities of SO 2 and NO x are higher for plants that use coal as an energy source, including the refinery in Decatur. By comparing with fuel‐based emission factors, we find that fuel ethanol refineries have lower NO x , similar VOC, and higher SO 2 emissions than from the use of this fuel in vehicles. The VOC emissions from refining could be higher than from vehicles, if the underestimated emissions in NEI‐2011 downwind from Decatur extend to other fuel ethanol refineries. Finally, chemical transformations of the emissions from Decatur were observed, including formation of new particles, nitric acid, peroxyacyl nitrates, aldehydes, ozone, and sulfate aerosol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it