MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107194313 · doi:10.1067/mcp.2000.104610

Venous neuropeptide Y receptor responsiveness in patients with chronic heart failure

2000· article· en· W2107194313 on OpenAlexaff
Qingping Feng, Mélanie Lambert, Ian D. Callow, Jayanth R. Arnold

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropeptide Y receptorInternal medicineEjection fractionMedicineHeart failureNeuropeptideEndocrinologyNorepinephrineVenous bloodCardiologyReceptorDopamine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure is associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity and elevated plasma neuropeptide Y levels. The aim of this study was to investigate whether increased neuropeptide Y release altered vascular neuropeptide Y responses in the dorsal hand veins in patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Neuropeptide Y responsiveness was studied in vivo with use of a hand vein tonometry technique in 14 patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values <20%, 16 patients with LVEF values from 20% to 35%, and 16 age-similar healthy control subjects. Plasma norepinephrine and neuropeptide Y levels were significantly elevated in patients with chronic heart failure and LVEF values <20% compared with control subjects (P < .01). Plasma neuropeptide Y but not norepinephrine levels were significantly elevated in patients with chronic heart failure and LVEF values from 20% to 35% compared with control subjects (P < .01). Increasing doses of neuropeptide Y (25 to 2,000 pmol/min) were infused into a dorsal hand vein of each subject. Dose-dependent venoconstriction to neuropeptide Y was observed in all subjects studied. The neuropeptide Y dose-response curve in patients with LVEF values from 20% to 35% was significantly shifted to the left compared with patients with LVEF values <20% and control subjects (P < .01), whereas no significant difference was observed between the control subjects and the patients with LVEF values <20%. No significant difference in neuropeptide Y dose responses was observed between patients with chronic heart failure with plasma neuropeptide Y levels above the median and patients with chronic heart failure with plasma neuropeptide Y levels below the median. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo venous neuropeptide Y receptor responsiveness is increased in patients with chronic heart failure and LVEF values from 20% to 35%. This increased neuropeptide Y responsiveness may contribute to venoconstriction at this stage of heart failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207