MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107291033 · doi:10.1109/ted.2005.843884

Analysis and Circuit Modeling of Waveguide-Separated Absorption Charge Multiplication-Avalanche Photodetector (WG-SACM-APD)

2005· article· en· W2107291033 on OpenAlex
Yasser M. El-Batawy, M. Jamal Deen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodetectorAvalanche photodiodeOptoelectronicsParasitic extractionEquivalent circuitMaterials scienceAbsorption (acoustics)ResistorElectronic engineeringOpticsVoltageElectrical engineeringPhysicsDetectorEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Waveguide photodetectors are considered leading candidates to overcome the bandwidth efficiency tradeoff of conventional photodetectors. In this paper, a theoretical physics-based model of the waveguide separated absorption charge multiplication avalanche photodetector (WG-SACM-APD) is presented. Both time and frequency modeling for this photodetector are developed and simulated results for different thicknesses of the absorption and multiplication layers and for different areas of the photodetector are presented. These simulations provide guidelines for the design of these high-performance photodiodes. In addition, a circuit model of the photodetector is presented in which the photodetector is a lumped circuit element so that circuit simulation of the entire photoreceiver is now feasible. The parasitics of the photodetector are included in the circuit model and it is shown how these parasitics degrade the photodetectors performance and how they can be partially compensated by an external inductor in series with the load resistor. The results obtained from the circuit model of the WG-SACM-APD are compared with published experimental results and good agreement is obtained. This circuit modeling can easily be applied to any WG-APD structure. The gain-bandwidth characteristic of WG-SACM-APD is studied for different areas and thicknesses of both the absorption and the multiplication layers. The dependence of the performance of the photodetector on the dimensions, the material parameters and the multiplication gain are also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it