Glucosyltransferases acting on starch or sucrose for the synthesis of oligosaccharides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work we review the extraordinary biotechnological potential of two glycosyltransferases, cyclodextrin glucanotransferase and dextransucrase, especially their utility in the synthesis of oligosaccharides. Both enzymes are non-Leloir transferases that require neither co-factors nor activated substrates, as they directly employ the free energy of cleavage of starch and sucrose, respectively. Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase is able to produce cyclodextrins from starch. In the presence of appropriate acceptors (e.g., carbohydrates), this enzyme furnishes oligosaccharides containing α(1[Formula: see text]4) bonds. Thus, we have found that glucose, maltose, and sucrose readily serve as acceptors to form the corresponding [Glc-α(1[Formula: see text]4)]n- oligosaccharides, with the degree of polymerization being controlled by the starch:acceptor ratio. The ability of other sugars and related compounds to act as acceptors is also reviewed. Dextransucrase is a glycansucrase that synthesizes dextran using sucrose as glucosyl donor. The formation of dextrans can be quantitatively replaced with the formation of novel oligosaccharides by adding alternative carbohydrate acceptors to the reaction medium. With the dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides B-1299, we have investigated the synthesis of gluco- oligosaccharides containing α(1[Formula: see text]2) bonds using methyl 1-O-α-D-glucopyranoside as the acceptor. These products constitute a class of nondigestible nutraceutical oligosaccharides with prebiotic properties relating to the stabilization and enhancement of gastrointestinal tract flora, and are being increasingly used by the food industry.Key words: glycansucrases, cyclodextrin glucanotransferase, cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase, dextransucrase, acceptor products, gluco-oligosaccharides, malto-oligosaccharides, coupling sugar, nutraceuticals, functional foods, prebiotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".