Meander belt entrapment of hydrocarbons at Saddle Lake, Alberta and an untested in situ combustion scheme for recovery of heavy oil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| September 01, 2003 Meander belt entrapment of hydrocarbons at Saddle Lake, Alberta and an untested in situ combustion scheme for recovery of heavy oil Ralph W. Edie; Ralph W. Edie Andrichuk and Edie, Independent Geologists, 504 Fording Place, 205 – 9th Avenue SE, Calgary, AB T2G 0R3 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John M. Andrichuk John M. Andrichuk Andrichuk and Edie, Independent Geologists, 504 Fording Place, 205 – 9th Avenue SE, Calgary, AB T2G 0R3 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ralph W. Edie Andrichuk and Edie, Independent Geologists, 504 Fording Place, 205 – 9th Avenue SE, Calgary, AB T2G 0R3 John M. Andrichuk Andrichuk and Edie, Independent Geologists, 504 Fording Place, 205 – 9th Avenue SE, Calgary, AB T2G 0R3 Publisher: Canadian Energy Geoscience Association Received: 07 Oct 2002 Accepted: 04 Jul 2003 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2003) 51 (3): 253–274. https://doi.org/10.2113/51.3.253 Article history Received: 07 Oct 2002 Accepted: 04 Jul 2003 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Ralph W. Edie, John M. Andrichuk; Meander belt entrapment of hydrocarbons at Saddle Lake, Alberta and an untested in situ combustion scheme for recovery of heavy oil. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2003;; 51 (3): 253–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/51.3.253 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract At Saddle Lake, Alberta, in the Lower Cretaceous Colony Formation, lenticular sandstones 25 m thick contain 13.7 degree API heavy viscous oil at a depth of about 500 metres. The lenticular sandstones, from their electric log character, are interpreted to be point bars deposited by lateral accretion within a highly meandering large river system.Each hydrocarbon-bearing lenticular sandstone contains a gas cap with an underlying heavy oil column, which in turn is underlain by salt water. The thickest oil columns are 9.8 to 14.0 metres thick and the gas caps have been largely depleted. Entrapment of the gas and oil appears to be caused by the overlying Joli Fou shale which forms a roof-seal and by shale-filled entrenched meandering river channels or oxbows which surround the hydrocarbon bearing sandstones.In the present scheme, recovery of the heavy oil by in situ combustion is proposed in two stages as follows:burn-out of the gas remaining in the gas cap, andcombustion of the oil from the top of the oil column downward by injection of oxygen (or air) through vertical wells arranged in a line drive pattern, with recovery of oil through horizontal wells drilled within but near the base of the oil column. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".