MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107585300 · doi:10.1139/o01-237

Production and characterization of an in vitro engineered human oral mucosa

2002· article· en· W2107585300 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Mahmoud Rouabhia, Noëlla Deslauriers

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOral mucosaLamina propriaKeratinSecretionBiologyBasement membraneCytokineEpitheliumImmunologyTumor necrosis factor alphaPathologyCell biologyMedicineAnatomyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of epithelial cells in oral pathologies is poorly understood. Until now, most studies have used normal or transformed epithelial cell monolayers, a system that largely bypasses oral mucosal complexity. To overcome these limitations, an engineered human oral mucosa (EHOM) model has been produced and characterized. Following histological and immunohistochemical analyses, EHOM showed well-organized and stratified tissues in which epithelial cells expressed proliferating keratins such as Ki-67, K14, and K19 and also differentiating keratin (K10). In this model, epithelial cells interacted with fibroblasts in the lamina propria by secreting basement membrane proteins (laminins) and by expressing integrins (beta1 and alpha2beta1). Cytokine analyses using cultured supernatants showed that cells in EHOM were able to secrete interleukins (IL) including IL-1beta and IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). Finally, cells in this engineered model were able to secrete different metalloproteinases such as gelatinase-A and gelatinase-B. In conclusion, using tissue engineering technology, we produced well-organized EHOM tissues. It is anticipated that this model will be useful for examining mechanisms involved in oral diseases under controlled conditions by modeling the interactions between mucosa and microorganisms in the oral cavity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchFrench-language works237,207