MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107589699 · doi:10.1159/000348274

Tunneled Pleural Catheters in the Management of Chylothorax from Central Venous Catheter-Related Superior Vena Cava Obstruction

2013· article· en· W2107589699 on OpenAlexaff
Vanessa Luks, Ahmed A. Aljohaney, Kayvan Amjadi

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiration · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChylothoraxChyleSurgerySuperior vena cavaCentral venous catheterSuperior vena cava syndromeCatheterPleural diseasePleural effusionInferior vena cavaRadiologyRespiratory diseaseComplicationLungInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chylothorax is characterized by the accumulation of chyle in the pleural space, of which the most common cause is trauma or neoplasm. Although chylothorax accounts for a small proportion of clinical pleural effusions, prompt recognition is needed to avoid malnutrition, immunodeficiency, and fibrothorax. We report 2 patients with superior vena cava obstruction caused by tunneled venous catheters resulting in chylothorax and demonstrate the potential safety of tunneled pleural catheters for prolonged chylothorax drainage in an outpatient setting with rigorous follow-up. Changes in pleural fluid chemistries of the effusions and the possible pathophysiology were assessed with a review of the literature on pleural fluid chemistries in superior vena cava obstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespirationSame topicLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207