MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107605512 · doi:10.1139/h06-020

Effects of physical conditioning on lipids and arachidonic acid metabolites in untrained boys: a longitudinal study

2006· article· en· W2107605512 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A Stergioulas, Dimitrios Filippou

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstacyclinArachidonic acidInternal medicineEndocrinologyThromboxaneMetaboliteMedicineThromboxane A2ChemistryPhysical exercisePlateletBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to a variety of lipids, 2 products of the arachidonic acid cascade, prostacyclin and thromboxane, are involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis as a result of their effects on platelet function and on the vascular endothelium. The aim of the present investigation was to ascertain if a sub-maximal 8 week endurance training period followed by a 4 week detraining period would have any effects on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), 2,3-dinor-6-keto-prostaglandin F(1alpha) (2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF(1alpha)), the urinary metabolite of prostacyclin, 2,3-dinor-thromboxane B2 (2,3-dinor-TXB2), the urinary metabolite of thromboxane, and the ratios of TC to HDL-C and of 2,3 dinor-6-keto-PGF(1alpha) to 2,3-dinor-TXB2. Thirty-eight boys aged 10-14 were randomly divided into exercise (n = 21) and control (n = 17) groups. The exercise group trained on a bicycle ergometer 4 times/week, 1 h/session, at 80% of their physical working capacity at a heart rate of 170 beats/min (PWC(170)), for 8 weeks. The control group did not participate in any specific physical exercise program. The results showed that relative to the control group, the exercise group had a significant increase in HDL-C and 2,3-dinor-6-keto-PGF(1alpha) concentrations at the end of the 4th (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) and the 8th week (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) of training, respectively; a significant increase in the 2,3 dinor-6-keto-PGF(1alpha) - 2,3-dinor-TXB2 ratio (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 at the same intervals); a significant decrease in TG at the end of the 8th week of training (p < 0.05); and a significant decrease in the TC--HDL-C ratio at the end of the 4th (p < 0.05) and 8th weeks of training (p < 0.001).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physiology Nutrition and MetabolismSame topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207