Central Circuitry in the Jellyfish <i>Aglantha Digitale</i>: III. the Rootlet and Pacemaker Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tactile stimulation of the subumbrella of Aglantha digitale was found to evoke an escape swimming response similar to that evoked by stimulation of the outer surfaces of the margin but that does not involve the ring giant axon. Evidence is presented that conduction around the margin takes place via an interconnected system of rootlet interneurones. Confocal microscopy of carboxyfluorescein-filled axons showed that the rootlet neurones run out from the bases of the motor giant axons within the inner nerve ring and come into close contact with those of the neighbouring motor giant axons on either side. Transmission between the rootlet neurones has the properties of chemical synaptic transmission. A distinct type of fast excitatory postsynaptic potential (rootlet PSP) was recorded in motor giant axons following stimulation of nearby axons in 3-5 mmol l(-)(1) Mn(2+), which lowered the PSP below spike threshold. Immune labelling with anti-syntaxin 1 showed structures tentatively identified as synapses in the inner nerve ring, including some on the rootlet neurones. Neuromuscular junctions were not labelled. A secondary consequence of stimulating motor giant axons was the triggering of events in the pacemaker system. Triggering was blocked in 105 mmol l(-)(1) Mg(2+), indicating a synaptic link. Activity in the pacemaker system led indirectly to tentacle contractions (as described in earlier papers in this series), but the contractions were not as sudden or as violent as those seen when escape swimming was mediated by the ring giant axon. Events triggered in the pacemaker system fed back into the motor giants, producing postsynaptic potentials that appeared as humps in the spike after-potential. The conduction velocity of events propagating in the relay system was increased when the rootlet pathway was simultaneously excited (piggyback effect). With the addition of the rootlet pathway, the number of identified systems concerned with locomotion, feeding and tentacle contractions comes to fourteen, and the list is probably nearly complete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".