MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107792249 · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.087486

Germline epimutations of <i>APC</i> are not associated with inherited colorectal polyposis: Figure 1

2006· letter· en· W2107792249 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Megan P. Hitchins, Catherine M. Suter, Jason W.H. Wong, Nicholas J. Hawkins, Barbara Leggett, Allan D. Spigelman, Ian Tomlinson, David I. K. Martin, Robyn L. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research Council
KeywordsCoronerMedicineMedical prescriptionOpioidPublic healthPublic health surveillanceMedical emergencyEmergency medicinePoison controlInjury preventionInternal medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GIST, first operated on 13 years earlier, and who now presented with four adjacent masses located in the rectovaginal septum and no distant metastasis.Molecular analysis identified a 6 bp deletion in exon 11 of the ckit proto-oncogene.As curative surgery would have implied abdominoperineal resection with permanent colostomy, treatment with imatinib at a standard dose (400 mg/ day) was started.Response to treatment was evaluated using endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging every three months.Quantification of tumour mass was obtained by adding the products of two perpendicular axes of the two major lesions.Maximal response was obtained at nine months, which was maintained after 12 months of treatment.At that time, total tumour mass reduction was 83%, which was enough to allow rectal resection with a coloanal anastomosis (fig 1A, B).Pathological analysis of the surgical specimen identified four white firm masses with diameters ranging from 1 to 2 cm.These lesions were composed of hyaline connective tissue, which did not stain with either CD34 or CD117, and no viable tumour cells were identified in the whole specimens (fig 1C-E).Imatinib was suspended and after 24 months of follow up there is no evidence of local or distant recurrence.This is, to our knowledge, the first report of a complete pathological response of a GIST treated with imatinib.Most GISTs have been shown to have activating mutations of the c-KIT or PDGF receptor alpha (PDGFRA) proto-oncogenes which result in constitutive activation of a tyrosine kinase.2 3 The main treatment for GIST is, whenever possible, based on surgical resection, as these tumours are resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy.For tumours which are not amenable to surgical resection, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib (Glivec; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), is actually the firstline treatment as it specifically inhibits most c-KIT and PDGFRA activated proteins.Preliminary results using imatinib treatment were very satisfactory, with greater than 50% reduction of tumour mass reported in 54% of cases.4 Although to date no data support the use of imatinib as neoadjuvant therapy, the last consensus meeting for the management of GISTs 5 suggests that this form of therapy may be used for tumours with certain locations (for example, rectum, or oesophagus), when function sparing surgery is the goal.Our case report is consistent with a recently published multicentre randomised trial involving 946 patients who received imatinib for local, advanced, or metastatic GIST.6 In this study, the authors observed that the time needed to achieve maximal response was 4-6 months, thereby recommending that studies on neoadjuvant therapy should be designed with a duration of treatment ranging from 4 to 6 months, which could be extended up to one year.The present report further supports these recommendations, mainly in cases with typical activating mutations and in those in whom surgery would lead to a marked loss of organ function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionFrench-language works237,207