MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107831615 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903915

HIV-Specific IL-21 Producing CD4+ T Cells Are Induced in Acute and Chronic Progressive HIV Infection and Are Associated with Relative Viral Control

2010· article· en· W2107831615 on OpenAlexafffund
Feng Yun Yue, Calvin Lo, Ali Sakhdari, Erika Yue Lee, Colin Kovacs, Erika Benko, Jun Liu, Haihan Song, R. Brad Jones, Prameet M. Sheth, Duncan Chege, Rupert Kaul, Mario Ostrowski

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalMaple Leaf Medical ClinicToronto General Hospital
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario HIV Treatment NetworkCanadian Foundation for AIDS ResearchOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsCD8ImmunologyBiologyCytotoxic T cellEffectorViral loadVirologyT cellVirusInterleukin 21Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Immune systemIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the role of CD4(+) T cell IL-21 production in viral control of HIV infection. HIV-infected individuals had greater circulating IL-21-producing CD4(+) T cells in blood compared with uninfected volunteers. HIV-specific IL-21-producing CD4(+) T cells were detected in blood during untreated acute and chronic HIV infection, and elevated frequencies of these cells correlated with relative viral control. These cells had an effector memory or end effector phenotype and expressed CXCR5. HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells exhibited high levels of IL-21R, indicating sensitivity to IL-21. Low or aviremic long-term nonprogressors, however, showed absent or low HIV-specific IL-21 CD4(+) T cells, but more easily detectable HIV-specific IL-2-producing CD4(+) T cells, suggesting changing requirements for particular gamma-chain cytokines depending on Ag abundance. Thus, IL-21-producing CD4(+) T cells are induced in viremic HIV infection and likely contribute to viral control by affecting CD8(+) T cell maintenance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207