MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107887482 · doi:10.2138/am.2012.4020

Crystal structure refinements of borate dimorphs inderite and kurnakovite using 11B and 25Mg nuclear magnetic resonance and DFT calculations

2012· article· en· W2107887482 on OpenAlexafffund
Bing Zhou, Vladimir K. Michaelis, Yuanming Pan, Yuan Yao, K. T. Tait, B. C. Hyde, John E. C. Wren, Barbara L. Sherriff, Scott Kroeker

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario MuseumUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Manitoba
FundersChinese Academy of Geological SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChinese Academy of SciencesNational Research Council CanadaFonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
KeywordsBoronCrystallographyAb initioDensity functional theoryMagic angle spinningChemistryCrystal structureAb initio quantum chemistry methodsNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopySingle crystalComputational chemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceMoleculeStereochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Borate minerals composed of [Bφ3] triangles and/or [Bφ4] tetrahedra (φ = O or OH) commonly exhibit complex polymerizations to form diverse polyanion groups. High-resolution solid-state magic angle spinning (MAS) 11B and 25Mg NMR spectroscopy at moderate to ultrahigh magnetic fields (9.4, 14.1, and 21.1 T) allows for very accurate NMR parameters to be obtained for the borate dimorphs, inderite, and kurnakovite, [MgB3O3(OH)5·5H2O]. Improved agreement between experimental results and ab initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations using Full Potential Linear Augmented Plane Wave (FP LAPW) with WIEN2k validates the geometry optimization procedures for these minerals and permits refinements of the hydrogen positions relative to previous X-ray diffraction crystal structures. In particular, the optimized structures lead to significant improvements in the positions of the H atoms, suggesting that H atoms have significant effects on the 11B and 25Mg NMR parameters in inderite and kurnakovite. This study shows that combined high-resolution NMR spectroscopy and ab initio theoretical modeling provides an alternative method for the refinement of crystal structures, especially H positions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207