MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107889383 · doi:10.1039/c5sc03575a

Mechanistic studies on the addition of hydrogen to iridaepoxide complexes with subsequent elimination of water

2015· article· en· W2107889383 on OpenAlexafffund
Lauren E. Doyle, Warren E. Piers, Javier Borau‐Garcia, Michael J. Sgro, Denis M. Spasyuk

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsChemistryIridiumReductive eliminationLigand (biochemistry)Elimination reactionCombinatorial chemistryCarbeneHydrogenStereochemistryCatalysisMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iridium complexes of the PC <sub>sp2</sub> P ligand in which the donors are linked by 2,3-benzo[ <italic>b</italic> ]thiophene groups engage in the cooperative activation of N <sub>2</sub> O and the resulting iridaepoxides can be treated with dihydrogen to effect elimination of water and regeneration of the starting iridium complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ScienceSame topicCatalytic C–H Functionalization MethodsFrench-language works237,207