MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107996440 · doi:10.1109/pac.1999.795637

Optically-pumped polarized H/sup -/ ion sources for RHIC and HERA colliders

2003· article· en· W2107996440 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Zelenski, V. Klenov, Yu. E. Kuznetsov, V. Zoubets, G. Dutto, S. Kadantsev, C.D.P. Levy, G. W. Wright, P. W. Schmor, J. Alessi, Yuichiro Mori, M. Okamura, Tetsuya Takeuchi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronTRIUMFU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsHERANuclear physicsPolarization (electrochemistry)IonHadronLuminosityBeam (structure)Ion beamParticle physicsOpticsQuantum chromodynamicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The TRIUMF OPPIS (optically pumped polarized ion source) provides high quality polarized H/sup -/ ion beam for studies of hadronic structure via the parity-violating weak interaction. High-current polarized H/sup -/ ion source development is now underway at TRIUMF for the new generation of polarization facilities at RHIC and HERA. The required 2/spl times/10/sup 32//s cm/sup 2/ luminosity in RHIC can be obtained with a 0.5 mA injected H/sup -/ ion beam intensity. Such an intensity was already produced in DC operation of the TRIUMF OPPIS, and a similar KEK OPPIS is being upgraded at TRIUMF for future installation at RHIC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207