MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108029083 · doi:10.1002/hed.24004

ATM, THMS, and RRM1 protein expression in nasopharyngeal carcinomas treated with curative intent

2015· article· en· W2108029083 on OpenAlexafffund
Jenny J. Ko, Alexander C. Klimowicz, Amanda Jagdis, Tien Phan, Janessa Laskin, Harold Lau, Jodi Siever, Stephanie Petrillo, Thomas A. Thomson, Michael Rose, Gwyn Bebb, Anthony M. Magliocco, Desirée Hao

Bibliographic record

VenueHead & Neck · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of British ColumbiaAlberta Cancer FoundationAllerGenUniversity of TorontoAlberta HealthBC Cancer AgencyFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Cancer Foundation
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioPercentileNasopharyngeal carcinomaConfidence intervalInternal medicineOncologyImmunohistochemistryBiomarkerCohortGastroenterologyHead and neck cancerRadiation therapyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), biomarkers may help predict survival. METHODS: Tumoral expression of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), thymidylate synthetase (THMS), and ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1), was correlated with survival in patients with nonmetastatic NPC using quantitative fluorescence immunohistochemistry with automated quantitative digital image analysis. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients included, 58 patients (40%) received concurrent chemoradiation therapy; the remainder was treated with radiation. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 78%); disease-free survival (DFS) was 48% (95% CI, 39% to 57%). OS worsened for increasing values of ATM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.83; 95% CI, 1.01-7.94; p = .049) for values greater than the 75th percentile compared to less than the 25th percentile, but improved for tumors with higher THMS levels (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.94; p = .033) for values greater than the 25th percentile compared to less than or equal to the 25th percentile. RRM1 was not associated with OS (p = .748). No biomarkers were associated with DFS. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, relative overexpression of ATM and low THMS levels were associated with worse OS. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E384-E391, 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHead & NeckSame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207