MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108109635 · doi:10.1139/g05-031

Linkage map of birch,<i>Betula pendula</i>Roth, based on microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphisms

2005· article· en· W2108109635 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Minna Pekkinen, Sirkka‐Liisa Varvio, K.K.M. Kulju, Hanni Kärkkäinen, Sampo Smolander, Anneli Viherä‐Aarnio, V. Koski, Mikko J. Sillanpää

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTekes
KeywordsBetula pendulaMicrosatelliteGenetic linkageLinkage (software)BiologyGeneticsPedigree chartGenetic linkage mapGene mappingBotanyGeneAlleleChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first genetic linkage map for silver birch, Betula pendula Roth, was constructed by using a pseudo-testcross mapping strategy and integration of linkage data from 3 unrelated 2-generation pedigrees. The map is based on the genetic inheritance and segregation of 82 amplified fragment length polyhmorphisms and 19 microsatellite markers, and was constructed by simultaneously comparing the performance of CRI-MAP and OUTMAP packages. The analysis revealed 16 linkage groups, and the total map coverage is 1561 cM (Kosambi units). Average map distance between adjacent markers is 15.5 cM. Linkage groups range between 6 and 18 loci and from 81.2 to 326.5 cM; the remaining 9 linkage groups consist of 2 or 3 loci ranging from 6.3 to 42.4 cM. The uncertainty of the map is illustrated with sensitivity analysis. This initial map can serve as a basis for developing a more detailed genetic map.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207